# Random Relativity

The flip of a coin has always been the most prominent and pervasive reference-point to defining what appears to be predicated by mere intermittency; but is the outcome of a coin-flip contingent on spontaneity, or is there an underlying principle that predetermines the end result.

When a coin is flipped there’s a 100% chance of it landing on either side; with exception to the third-side which is a rarity because of the size, length and width discrepancy principle.

Randomness is a false dichotomy, a conjecture deriving from scientific prejudice; the ability to detect consistency as opposed to the contrast being an enigma creates an analytical discrepancy;

Thus the fallacy derives from the inability to demystify a concept that falls outside the parameters of scientific understanding. The unpredictability of a coin-flip is unequivocally inconsistent in it’s outcome, hence the illusion of randomness is assumed.

If a projectile shape machine flips a coin to a specific height, at a designated speed, protruding at a specific angle, while taking into consideration a myriad of variables such as: climate, temperature, gravitational forces etc.

On a mathematical level the predetermining outcomes can be predicated using mathematical equations. Even if there’s contrasting results, you can inevitably tweak the machine to create an equilibrium, an over 75% will constitute an accuracy.

Here’s the irony; the experiment only proves that randomness is contingent on relativity, with respect to who or what is predicating the outcome. So even if the flip of a coin has been demystified as not being random, it is only from a relative perspective, and the core of randomness actually exist in human fallibility.

The coin-flip seems arbitrary in nature, but the real intermittency exist within human fallibility. Our inability to accurately flip a coin consistently, flawlessly and with precision is what predetermines the random outcome, not the actual flipping-of-the-coin itself, but the preceding inception of the flips.

So within the context of a coin-flip, its random but it’s not, it’s relative and conducive to who or what is flipping the coin. This begs a much bigger question; if the enigma of such factuality can be isolated, can this serve as a metaphorical precept to interpret randomness with respect to human interaction and other attributes?

Such as cause and effect, investing, quantum mechanics, space and infinity? All these attributes share a common denominator, there’s a deep-seeded level of ambiguity engrained in these concepts, and it’s myriad of interpretations are intrinsically arbitrary or random.

# UPCOMING TED TALK LECTURES

 The Wave-Medium Dichotomy Between Light and Sound The Contrasting Distinctions Between Metaphor and Analogy Thermodynamics and The Industrial Revolution Analogically Correlating The Third Law of Motion Equilibrium American History Pervasive With Irony 13th, 14th, 15th Amendment The Fallibility of Improper Metaphor Congress and Atoms Sarcasm Phonology, Ambiguity, Semiotics, Semantics etc.. Dramatic, Situational, Verbal, Tragic, Socratic Irony Apophenia, Pareidolia, Psychosis, Schizophrenia Synchronicity, Serendipity, Irony, Coincidences Lexical, Syntactical and Structural Ambiguity Incongruous Juxtaposition Resolution

Academic Writer – Journalist – Lecturer
The Harlem Times Ask A Newyorker News Blaze
Feel free to contact me at: mrpregnant@aol.com

VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
Random Relativity, 10.0 out of 10 based on 1 rating
The following two tabs change content below.

#### Atelston Fitzgerald Holder 1st

The study of Spatial Schema, Semiotics, Phonetics, Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics & Pragmatics. Metaphor & Analogy in Physics, Music, Economics, Zoology and Biology. Theory of Light, Sound, Special & General Relativity. Hobbies; Music Theory, The Stock-Market & Equity Investing. Current Status: The Ghost of Ambiguity!